Not quadrat matrix

Not quadrat matrix - Messages

#1 Posted: 2 years ago
Valery Ochkov

Valery Ochkov

55 likes in 634 posts.

Group: User

The work with not quadrat matrix.
How better solve?
See please the attached sm-file.
1-Asteroid-5-Points.sm (25 KiB) downloaded 125 time(s).
#2 Posted: 2 years ago
Jean Giraud

Jean Giraud

983 likes in 6,866 posts.

Group: User

Wrote

The work with not quadrat matrix.
How better solve?


As it looks, the blue planet and green voyager are tangent.
Take care Valery ... Jean.

1-Asteroid-5-Points.sm (34 KiB) downloaded 116 time(s).

#3 Posted: 2 years ago
Alvaro Diaz Falconi

Alvaro Diaz Falconi

1,005 likes in 1,677 posts.

Group: User

Hi Valery. You can use dn_LinAlgLLS_SVD or dn_LinAlgLLS_COF or dn_LinAlgLLS_QRorLQ for non-square matrices, instead dn_LinAlgSolve.

1-Asteroid-5-Points.sm (27 KiB) downloaded 109 time(s).

Best regards.
Alvaro.

1 users liked this post
Valery Ochkov 2 years ago
#4 Posted: 2 years ago
Valery Ochkov

Valery Ochkov

55 likes in 634 posts.

Group: User

Thanks Alvaro.
10-2-Asteroid-7-points.sm (21 KiB) downloaded 125 time(s).

#5 Posted: 2 years ago
Alvaro Diaz Falconi

Alvaro Diaz Falconi

1,005 likes in 1,677 posts.

Group: User

A little more compact.

Clipboard03.png

Best regards.
Alvaro.
1 users liked this post
Valery Ochkov 2 years ago
#6 Posted: 2 years ago
Valery Ochkov

Valery Ochkov

55 likes in 634 posts.

Group: User

Thanks Alvaro.
New problem with Ranks
10-2-Asteroid-7-points-Rank.sm (16 KiB) downloaded 114 time(s).
10-2-Asteroid-7-points-Rank.png
#7 Posted: 2 years ago
Alvaro Diaz Falconi

Alvaro Diaz Falconi

1,005 likes in 1,677 posts.

Group: User

Wrote

... New problem with Ranks


Hi Valery. SMath really needs to improve on linear algebra. As a workaround, you can redefine rank with a plugin

Clipboard01.png

Also, the problem with rank is not that it can't deal with complicated arrays, it can't handle simple ones either

Clipboard02.png

10-2-Asteroid-7-points-Rank.sm (19 KiB) downloaded 115 time(s).

Best regards-
Alvaro.
2 users liked this post
sergio 2 years ago, Valery Ochkov 2 years ago
#8 Posted: 2 years ago
Valery Ochkov

Valery Ochkov

55 likes in 634 posts.

Group: User

Why?
10-2-Asteroid-7-points-Rank.sm (28 KiB) downloaded 121 time(s).
5-7-points.png
#9 Posted: 2 years ago
Alvaro Diaz Falconi

Alvaro Diaz Falconi

1,005 likes in 1,677 posts.

Group: User

Wrote

Why?



Hi. Due to numerical errors. These ranks are evaluated with numerical procedures. That means that for some cases they must necessarily fail. You can introduce some kind of tolerance in the function. Maple also fails in this example.

Clipboard01.png

This shows that the rank function that is executed is that of maple.

Clipboard02.png

However, I don't know how to call Maxima's rank function, it is not in the Takeover options.

Here some notes about how to handle a little better the issue.

10-2-Asteroid-7-points-Rank.sm (35 KiB) downloaded 113 time(s).

Best regards.
Alvaro.
1 users liked this post
Valery Ochkov 2 years ago
#10 Posted: 2 years ago
Martin Kraska

Martin Kraska

1,230 likes in 2,156 posts.

Group: Moderator

Maxima gives the correct answer. Yet I think that maple is not to blame, because maple(rank(M)) sends 4 to maple. At least this happens with Maxima(rank(M)).

In Maxima I have a workaround for such cases. First I convey the definition of M to Maxima and then call rank(M). The format "$...§" conveys everything inside the markup as verbatim expression to Maxima. without giving SMath the chance to interfere.

Should not be too complicated to add rank() to the takeover candidates.

2023-11-03 13_03_03-SMath Solver 1.0.8477 - [10-2-Asteroid-7-points-Rank (1).sm_].png
10-2-Asteroid-7-points-Rank _Kr.sm (40 KiB) downloaded 119 time(s).
Martin Kraska Pre-configured portable distribution of SMath Studio: https://en.smath.info/wiki/SMath%20with%20Plugins.ashx
2 users liked this post
Valery Ochkov 2 years ago, sergio 2 years ago
#11 Posted: 2 years ago
Alvaro Diaz Falconi

Alvaro Diaz Falconi

1,005 likes in 1,677 posts.

Group: User

Hi Martin.

Wrote

Maxima gives the correct answer ...



Nope. The issue is about a matrix C=augment( A,b ), where b is a column vector so, it must to have the same rank as A.

Clipboard01.png

Wrote

... Yet I think that maple is not to blame, because maple(rank(M)) sends 4 to maple. At least this happens with Maxima(rank(M)).



Either. In some way maple holds the rank function and evaluates it on its own kernel. Actually, the example with the matrix M is for show that.

Best regards.
Alvaro.
1 users liked this post
Valery Ochkov 2 years ago
  • New Posts New Posts
  • No New Posts No New Posts